Facebook is right to call the government’s bluff

Paul Budde

As mentioned in previous analyses the way that the government has approached its battle with the digital giants has been flawed from the beginning.

True its tough stand had made Google pay media companies well above what these companies would have been able to negotiate individually with Google, but the fundamentals of why these battles are taking place are still unchanged.

Google was prepared to pay these ‘premiums’ to make sure that its business model would still survive. It is the company’s advertising business model that it was keen to protect and for that reason it was prepared to pay off the news companies.

Face to face: In this stand-off Google is right to call government’s bluff

So nothing fundamental has been solved by the Australian Government through its media code. It is now simply waiting for the next battle and the regulator (ACCC) has also already foreshadowed that it will concentrate on that advertising business model.

This will be a much tougher battle that Australia will not be able to win on its own. Google will use its full legal power with gigantic financial resources to defend their business.

It also shows that actions from individual governments are counterproductive. The French who took a different approach got only a fraction of the money for its media companies than that Google has paid to Australian media, so how will that make the French feel.

Only united action against global digital moguls will lead to structural changes and I have mentioned some of such structural changes as proposed by the EU: Can we control the Digital Platforms.

Now on to Facebook. I totally agree with Facebook that the Government’s action in relation to the way that Facebook distributes news is out of all proportions and as a matter of fact totally wrong.

All news organisations around the world totally voluntary distribute their news to whoever wants to use it. Facebook is not involved in this at all. Unlike Google, it doesn’t abstract content; it doesn’t create news snippets and it does not distribute links.

All of this is up to the news companies who are providing their services via Facebook. It is totally up to them if they provide full articles, snippets, links, send users to pay walls, etc.

It is true that all the information that is now blocked by Facebook can be obtained elsewhere.

However, Facebook is such a well-known, integrated platform, used by the majority of Australians that it will be the organisations who provide services on the platform and who are now blocked, who are the ones that suffer from this action.

I would think that common sense here will prevail, and that the government will limit the media code to those digital companies that are actively making money from the content of others.

Unlike Google the media code doesn’t really affect their business model, so there was no need for them to negotiate as there was, as a matter of fact nothing to negotiate.

If the government wants to stick to its media code it will also have to make Twitter, LinkedIn and others pay for the same service that Facebook provides. You could even argue that telephone and postal service which are used to distribute news should fall under that code, of course totally ridiculous.

It is also in the government’s own interest that it can continue to use the Facebook platform to distribute its own news. Once again there are other ways to do that, but the reach of Facebook is unsurpassed and as such very valuable for the distribution of such information.

Do I let Facebook off the hook? Totally not, but if we want to get control over the digital media and avoid the damage that they are doing to our society, economy and democracy we need to be far more strategic and we globally will need to work together on those issues.

Do you know more? Contact James Riley via Email.

Leave a Comment