Govt research commercialisation focus is ‘too narrow’


Denham Sadler
National Affairs Editor

The government’s $2 billion effort to improve Australia’s commercialisation efforts is welcome, but the approach is too narrow and risks undervaluing basic research, UTS special innovation advisor Professor Roy Green says.

Prime Minister Scott Morrison on Tuesday announced a $2 billion funding package aimed at research commercialisation, including a $1.6 billion economic accelerator with $150 million for Main Sequence Ventures, and $296 million for new PhDs.

Roy Green
UTS Special Innovation Advisor Roy Green

The new funding and increased focus on the area where Australia has traditionally struggled has been welcomed, but the Opposition and a number of academics have criticised the strategy behind the funding, and questioned whether it is the best approach.

According to Professor Green, who authored a seminal report on Australia’s innovation system for a Senate inquiry, this funding would be better targeted at a more comprehensive, ecosystem-wide approach to improving commercialisation.

“It’s a welcome announcement because it will plug some gaps in the commercialisation structure, but at the same time it’s still based on a linear, lab-to-market model rather than a comprehensive approach to the development of innovation ecosystems with an institutional policy structure that lasts beyond individual projects,” Professor Green told InnovationAus.

“It’s a narrow approach to commercialisation. Commercialisation should be about the whole ecosystem of creativity, experimentation and its reflection in a commercial product in the end. We need the whole ecosystem to work for us to be successful, as opposed to just taking out specific ideas and then in isolation translating them into a commercial outcome.”

He pointed to the UK’s Catapult Centres, which support businesses in commercialising ideas, as a better approach for Australia to adopt with this level of funding.

“We lack those kinds of innovation intermediaries in Australia. The Growth Centres were supposed to be that but they were never given enough scale or structure that would have enabled them to carry out that role,” Professor Green said.

“We need a structure that is similar and which is at least as effective as the UK Catapult Structure, especially in manufacturing.”

The significant focus on commercialisation can’t be at the cost of basic research either, Professor Green said.

“We need to note that we don’t want to undervalue basic research either. We can’t switch everything to commercialisation, we don’t want to diminish the role of basic research, which has already been starved for funding,” he said.

UNSW Founders Director of Entrepreneurship David Burt also said that the government is taking the wrong approach when it comes to commercialisation.

“If we’re serious about seeing Australian research commercialised, we need a greater focus on incentives for the individuals who will take the risks and do the hard work of commercialisation. Successful research commercialisation is far more about people than patents,” Mr Burt said.

“The government needs to put a firm focus on incentives for researchers to turn their research into commercially viable businesses. Today’s announcement is a step in the right direction but more needs to be done to help people change their behaviour.”

Science and Technology Australia (STA) has welcomed the government package, with the representative group having lobbied for a $2 billion research translation fund for several years.

STA President Professor Mark Hutchinson said it has the potential to “turbo-charge” Australia’s research commercialisation success”.

“We see vast potential for it to ‘level up’ Australian research commercialisation success, and generate stronger returns on investment for the nation from our world-leading research,” Professor Hutchinson said.

“Australia has a wealth of talent, ideas and expertise in research breakthroughs. But for too long, the country has lacked the support and infrastructure for more of our research to bridge the ‘valley of death’ between research and commercialisation. This announcement has the potential to be a game-changer.”

The Opposition has come out swinging following the Coalition’s commercialisation announcement, with shadow science minister Richard Marles saying the government has “zero credibility” when it comes to science.

“It’s deeply embarrassing that it’s taken the Coalition nearly a decade in power and a looming election to simply acknowledge what scientists and Labor have known for years – there is value in commercialising Australian science,” Mr Marles said.

“This is the most anti-science government to ever hold office in Australia. In fact, under Scott Morrison’s Coalition our nation’s relationship with technology has become fraught.”

Do you know more? Contact James Riley via Email.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Related stories